- Posted June 27, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
At the Supremes: Pharma wins, Anna Nicole's estate loses
The Daily Record Newswire
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down six opinions this week- including two big wins for pharmaceutical companies, and a loss for the estate of Anna Nicole Smith.
In PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, the Court held that federal regulations governing generic drugs directly conflict with, and thus preempt, state law failure-to-warn claims.
In Sorrell v. IMS, the Court ruled that Vermont's Prescription Confidentiality Law, which restricts access to information in nonpublic prescription drug records and affords prescribers the right to consent before their identifying information in prescription drug records is sold or used in marketing runs, violates the First Amendment under a heightened scrutiny standard.
In a complex ruling in the case Stern v. Marshall, the Court held that bankruptcy court did not have constitutional authority to award the Smith estate hundreds of millions of dollars in damages on a counterclaim against the estate of her late husband, oil tycoon J. Howard Marshall II.
Published: Mon, Jun 27, 2011
headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Levin Center unveils 'Learning by Hearings' classroom resources
- OWLS Meeting
headlines National
- Techshow attendees dig deeper into AI uses and capabilities
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Where can 1Ls get five-figure signing bonuses?
- Law firms see more cyberattacks, ransomware threats, new report says
- BigLaw’s share of litigation funding dropped in 2025
- Woman faces murder charge after allegedly taking abortion medication




