- Posted June 27, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
At the Supremes: Pharma wins, Anna Nicole's estate loses
The Daily Record Newswire
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down six opinions this week- including two big wins for pharmaceutical companies, and a loss for the estate of Anna Nicole Smith.
In PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, the Court held that federal regulations governing generic drugs directly conflict with, and thus preempt, state law failure-to-warn claims.
In Sorrell v. IMS, the Court ruled that Vermont's Prescription Confidentiality Law, which restricts access to information in nonpublic prescription drug records and affords prescribers the right to consent before their identifying information in prescription drug records is sold or used in marketing runs, violates the First Amendment under a heightened scrutiny standard.
In a complex ruling in the case Stern v. Marshall, the Court held that bankruptcy court did not have constitutional authority to award the Smith estate hundreds of millions of dollars in damages on a counterclaim against the estate of her late husband, oil tycoon J. Howard Marshall II.
Published: Mon, Jun 27, 2011
headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law captivated by prominent Harvard professor analyzing artificial intelligence
- MSU Law Moot Court team of two 3L students emerges national champions at First Amendment Competiton in D.C.
- Former insurance pro studies in Dual JD program
- Levin Center unveils 'Learning by Hearings' classroom resources
- OWLS Meeting
headlines National
- Inter American University of Puerto Rico School of Law back in compliance with ABA standard
- Chemerinsky: The Fourth Amendment comes back to the Supreme Court
- Reinstatement of retired judge reversed by state supreme court
- Mass tort lawyer suspended for 3 years for lying to clients
- Law firms in Minneapolis are helping lawyers, staff navigate unrest
- Federal judge faces trial on charges of being ‘super drunk’ while driving




