- Posted December 15, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court Roundup
Illinois
Judge pulled from asbestos cases over donations
EDWARDSVILLE, Ill. (AP) -- A judge who was assigned to hear all of the asbestos cases in her southwestern Illinois county was stripped of those cases after it was revealed her campaign committee received $30,000 in contributions from area law firms specializing in asbestos-related cases.
Madison County Circuit Judge Barbara Crowder was relieved of the asbestos cases Tuesday, and her cases were given to Associate Judge Clarence Harrison, the Belleville News-Democrat reported. The reassignment was first reported Tuesday by a Madison County legal publication, though that story made no mention of the campaign contributions.
Crowder, who presided over the county's asbestos cases since July of last year, signed a preliminary order giving three law firms the majority of the trial slots for the 2013 asbestos docket, the paper reported. Within days, lawyers from those firms gave Crowder's campaign $30,000 in contributions.
Ed Murnane, who heads the Illinois Civil Justice League, a business-backed judicial watchdog group, said plaintiffs' lawyers use the trial slots as national marketing tools that allow them to "sell the fact to a prospective client that you already have time in a courtroom."
Crowder, a Democrat who has been a circuit judge since 2006 and is up for retention in November, did not respond to a phone message seeking comment Wednesday left at the home she shares with her husband, Lawrence Taliana, who is her campaign committee's chairman.
The county's chief judge, Ann Callis, said she transferred the cases away from Crowder, in consultation with circuit judges, "to maintain the public trust in a fair and unbiased judiciary." She declined additional comment, including about whether a complaint was filed with the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, which investigates cases of possible judicial misconduct.
The Illinois Judicial Conduct Code does not explicitly bar judges' campaign committees from accepting contributions from law firms, but it does say judges should conduct themselves "in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."
Murnane said common sense should have told Crowder she should not take contributions from plaintiffs' attorneys in asbestos cases.
"The court of common sense, the court of fairness would suggest this was a terrible blunder on the part of Judge Crowder," Murnane said. "Without knowing all the details, it is exactly the kind of conduct that causes citizens to lose faith in the judicial system and their judges."
Virginia
Abuse charge dismissed in Va heroin baby case
STAFFORD, Va. (AP) -- A Virginia woman who gave birth to a heroin-addicted baby has been convicted of a drug charge.
But a Stafford County Circuit Court judge dismissed a child abuse charge against 24-year-old Krystal Lynn Woodson.
The Free Lance-Star reports that Judge J. Martin Bass found Woodson guilty of heroin possession on Tuesday.
Defense attorney Jim Ilijevich had argued that Virginia's child abuse laws do not apply to fetuses.
Prosecutors say Woodson gave birth to the boy on Feb. 5. He received treatment for addiction at Mary Washington Hospital and now is in the care of his paternal grandmother.
North Carolina
Governor vetoes death-row racial bias bill
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue has vetoed a bill that would have essentially repealed a 2009 law designed to address alleged racial bias in death penalty cases.
Perdue announced her veto Wednesday of the measure that would eliminate key provisions of the Racial Justice Act.
Perdue also signed the 2009 bill into law. It says a judge must reduce a death sentence to life in prison without parole if he determines racial bias was a significant factor to impose the death sentence.
Prosecutors who pushed the repeal said the act would clog up the court system with new appeals, creating a permanent moratorium on capital punishment.
Perdue's decision means she must call the Legislature back to Raleigh by Jan. 8 to consider an override.
Washington
Alleged White House shooter due in court Friday
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal judge has set a new court date to hear more evidence about the mental health of a man accused of firing shots at the White House in November.
Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez of Idaho appeared Wednesday in federal court in Washington, where a judge set another hearing for Friday. Ortega is accused of using an assault rifle to fire at the White House on Nov. 11, when President Barack Obama was out of town. He is charged with attempting to assassinate the president.
Acquaintances have said Ortega acted strangely in recent months, suggesting he believed he was Jesus and calling Obama "the devil." A preliminary psychiatric screening found him competent to stand trial, but federal prosecutors are asking for more extensive tests.
Published: Thu, Dec 15, 2011
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- Lucy Lang, NY inspector general, has always wanted rules evenly applied
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2024 Year in Review: Integrated legal AI and more effective case management
- How to ensure your legal team is well-prepared for the shifting privacy landscape
- Judge denies bid by former Duane Morris partner to stop his wife’s funeral
- Attorney discipline records short of disbarment would be expunged after 8 years under state bar plan