DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Department of Agriculture “demonstrated a disregard for its own regulations” in a 2.2-acre wetlands dispute with a former Michigan congressman whose family farm has been cut off from federal crop programs since 2009, according to an appeals court.
The court, in a recent 3-0 decision, ruled in favor of former U.S. Rep. Nick Smith, a Republican from Hillsdale County, and ordered the case be sent back to regulators with strict instructions.
The USDA accused Smith, 80, of illegally converting a wetland and blocked him and family members from crop programs, including corn subsidies and other benefits.
They own more than 2,000 acres in Hillsdale and Lenawee counties in southern Michigan, used mostly for corn, soybeans and wheat.
The 2009 decision sent Smith on a “bureaucratic labyrinth” with appeals to agency officials at various levels in Michigan and Washington, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said.
The government didn’t consider evidence that the land alterations in Hillsdale County’s Somerset Township had little effect on surrounding wetlands, the court said.
The court said the case could have consequences for thousands of farmers.
Smith, who was a member of the House Agriculture Committee, said he’s pleased with the decision.
- Posted April 14, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Former congressman wins appeal in wetlands dispute

headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- This Is the Moment
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- BigLaw partner won’t charge his $3,250 hourly rate to defend New Jersey cities in Trump administration suits
- After second federal judge withdraws error-riddled ruling, litigants seek explanation
- 5 hallucinated cases lead federal judge to kick 3 Butler Snow lawyers off case
- Bondi files ethics complaint against federal judge who reportedly expressed concern about ‘constitutional crisis’