NEW YORK (AP) — The former chairman and CEO of insurer AIG says he still believes he’s entitled to damages as a result of the government’s 2008 bailout of the company, and will appeal a ruling against him.
A federal judge gave Maurice Greenberg a partial win this week, ruling that the $85 billion government bailout was unfairly punitive and that the government was not entitled to take ownership of AIG in
return for its bailout loan. But the judge said the government doesn’t have to pay damages to Greenberg.
Greenberg says he will appeal that part of the ruling but is pleased with the rest.
Greenberg wants more than $40 billion in damages. He said that if the government wasn’t allowed to demand equity in AIG as a condition of the bailout, it’s also not entitled to the money it received from selling AIG shares later.
Judge Thomas Wheeler also said the government violated the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution when it took an 80 percent stake in AIG.
- Posted June 19, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ex-AIG CEO still wants damages in bailout case

headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- Bryanna Jenkins advocates for the Black transgender community
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Florida AG held in civil contempt for disobeying order; ‘litigants cannot change the plain meaning of words,’ judge says
- Barrister’s new mystery novel offers glimpse inside the Inner Temple
- Disbarment recommended for ex-Trump lawyer Eastman by State Bar Court of California panel
- Retired California justice faces disciplinary charges for allegedly taking too long to decide cases