HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania appellate court has struck down a law designed to make it easier for organizations like the National Rifle Association to challenge local firearms ordinances in court.
Commonwealth Court ruled recently that the procedure lawmakers used to enact the law violated the state constitution.
Under the law, gun owners no longer had to show they were harmed by an ordinance to challenge it, and it let “membership organizations” like the NRA sue on behalf of any Pennsylvania member.
The provision was merged in last year’s legislative session with a bill whose intent was to establish criminal penalties for theft of secondary metals, such as wires or cables.
The judges say it violated constitutional requirements that bills can’t be altered to change their original purpose and must be confined to one subject.
- Posted June 29, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court rejects law that aided gun challenges

headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- This Is the Moment
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- BigLaw partner won’t charge his $3,250 hourly rate to defend New Jersey cities in Trump administration suits
- After second federal judge withdraws error-riddled ruling, litigants seek explanation
- 5 hallucinated cases lead federal judge to kick 3 Butler Snow lawyers off case
- Bondi files ethics complaint against federal judge who reportedly expressed concern about ‘constitutional crisis’