DOVER, Del. (AP) — Delaware’s Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments on the constitutionality of the state’s death penalty.
The court has asked the attorney general’s office and state public defender’s office to prepare for arguments June 15.
The court agreed in January to answer questions from Delaware’s Superior Court to determine whether the state’s death penalty law meets constitutional muster.
Meanwhile, all death penalty trials in Delaware are on hold.
Questions were raised about the constitutionality of Delaware’s law after the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year struck down Florida’s death penalty sentencing statute.
That statute required a judge, not a jury, to find the factual existence of an “aggravating circumstance” making a defendant eligible for the death penalty.
Delaware’s law is similar to Florida’s, but prosecutors argue that it nevertheless is constitutional.
- Posted April 27, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Arguments set on death penalty law

headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Legal champions to receive Spirit of Excellence Award at 2026 ABA Midyear Meeting
- Fake Sullivan & Cromwell entities used by scammers should be dissolved, suit says
- Hackers gained access to ‘small number’ of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms
- Before joining Anderson Kill, judge was accused of rude behavior on bench, retaliatory threats in ethics case