––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted January 05, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
FTC, ABA dismiss remaining counts

By Kimberly Atkins
The Daily Record Newswire
The Federal Trade Commission and the American Bar Association have agreed to dismiss the remaining counts of the lawsuit the ABA brought to stop the agency from enforcing its "red flags" anti-data theft regulations against lawyers.
However, the ABA reserved the right to renew its claims on the remaining counts of the complaint should the FTC appeal the summary judgment.
In October, a federal judge granted the ABA summary judgment on one count of the complaint, blocking the FTC from enforcing the "red flags" rules against lawyers.
The lawsuit also sought other declaratory and injunctive relief.
However, after the summary judgment ruling, the parties were asked to file a joint statement explaining their positions as to whether the remaining claims need be addressed.
Last week, the ABA and the FTC filed the joint statement as well as their respective proposed orders. Both the ABA and the FTC agreed in the filings that the court should rule that the regs are not applicable to attorneys, and that the remaining counts should be dismissed.
If either of the proposed orders is accepted, it would bring to an end the first round of the legal battle between the attorney group and the agency, although the FTC has until January to decide if it will formally appeal the court's ruling on the summary judgment order.
The FTC stated in the joint statement that it assumes "because the court granted summary judgment on Count I of the ABA's complaint, it intended to preclude 'appli[cation of] the Red Flags Rule to lawyers engaged in the practice of law,' regardless of the particular billing arrangement entered into between the attorney and client."
But it reserved some wiggle room in case the court enters a narrower ruling.
"If, however, the court did not intend such a broad result, the court should enter an appropriately narrower injunction, or permit further proceedings to allow the parties to brief the appropriate scope of the injunction," the FTC said.
The FTC also asked the court not to extend the injunction "as requested by the ABA [to] 'any successor regulation promulgated by the Commission under §114 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 ... against lawyers engaged in the practice of law.'"
"It is the Commission's position that such relief would go beyond the issues asserted in the ABA's complaint and adjudicated by this court," the agency said in the joint statement.
The FTC has until mid-January to decide if it will appeal the ruling that precludes it from enforcing the rules against attorneys.
Published: Tue, Jan 5, 2010
headlines Macomb
- Macomb County Meals on Wheels in urgent need of volunteers ahead of holiday season
- MDHHS hosting three, free virtual baby showers in November and December for new or expecting families
- MDHHS secures nearly 100 new juvenile justice placements through partnerships with local communities and providers
- MDHHS seeking proposals for student internship stipend program to enhance behavioral health workforce
- ABA webinar November 30 to explore the state of civil legal aid in America
headlines National
- Bryanna Jenkins advocates for the Black transgender community
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Florida AG held in civil contempt for disobeying order; ‘litigants cannot change the plain meaning of words,’ judge says
- Barrister’s new mystery novel offers glimpse inside the Inner Temple
- Disbarment recommended for ex-Trump lawyer Eastman by State Bar Court of California panel
- Retired California justice faces disciplinary charges for allegedly taking too long to decide cases