––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted May 06, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State - ALSP presents Summation Training

The Michigan Chapter of the Association of Litigation Support Professionals (ALSP) will begin offering Summation Training courses starting in May of 2010. These courses are structured to meet the needs of virtually all current and potential users of this powerful litigation management software. The course instructors are all CT Summation Certified Trainers who have extensive experience with this software and its use in everyday litigation matters in some of Michigan's largest law firms. Below are brief descriptions of the courses which will be offered:
Summation 201- Document Management (2 hours)
Summation 202- Transcript Management (2 hours)
Summation 301- Intermediate Summation (2 hours); prerequisite 201 and 202
Summation 401- Advanced Summation (2 hours); prerequisite 201, 202 and 301
The classes will be held beginning in May and ending in June. For more information on registration, the course descriptions, dates and locations please visit the ALSP Michigan Chapter webpage at www.alsponline.org (select the Eastern Michigan Chapter page).
The cost for all courses is $75 per class for non-ALSP members, or $50 for current ALSP members.
Contact Jill Pace to register or for more information at jpace@xactdatadiscovery.com.
Published: Thu, May 6, 2010
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- March 1, 1828: Sojourner Truth goes to court
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- DOJ nominees hedge on whether court orders must always be followed
- DNA evidence in open cases explored in ABC reality series
- Which law-related films have won Oscars? You may be surprised (photo gallery)
- ‘Radical agreement’ could lead to Supreme Court victory for reverse-discrimination plaintiff