––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://test.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted July 15, 2010
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Courts - Nebraska Judge blocks state's new abortion screening law Planned Parenthood says law could be difficult to comply with
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4cd7/f4cd71736d08c32f8d05e12db81ecb61f7af6d15" alt=""
By Josh Funk
Associated Press Writer
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) -- A federal judge on Wednesday blocked a new Nebraska law requiring mental health screenings for women seeking abortions because the measure could have made it impossible to get an abortion in the state.
U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp granted Planned Parenthood of the Heartland's request for a preliminary injunction against the law, which was supposed to take effect Thursday. The order will prevent the state from enforcing the law until the lawsuit challenging it is decided.
Planned Parenthood said the law could be difficult to comply with and requires doctors to give information irrelevant to abortions.
State officials have said it is designed to make sure women understand the risks and complications that may accompany an abortion.
Officials with Planned Parenthood and the Nebraska Attorney General's officials were not immediately available to comment after the ruling was released Wednesday morning.
Smith Camp said the evidence presented so far showed that the screening law would make it harder for women to get an abortion in Nebraska by requiring screenings that could be impossible to perform under a literal reading of the law. She also said the law would make doctors who perform abortions at risk of crippling lawsuits.
"The effect of LB 594 will be to place substantial, likely insurmountable, obstacles in the path of women seeking abortions in Nebraska," Smith Camp said.
The judge said Planned Parenthood's arguments that the law was vague and could be cumbersome were persuasive, and the potential harm the law could do made a preliminary injunction appropriate.
"Plaintiffs have presented substantial evidence that the disclosures mandated by LB 594, if applied literally, will require medical providers to give untruthful, misleading and irrelevant information to patients," Smith Camp said in her ruling.
The law would require women wanting abortions to be screened by doctors or other health professionals to determine whether they were pressured into having the procedure. Women also would have to be screened for risk factors indicating if they could have mental or physical problems after an abortion.
The risks could be "physical, psychological, emotional, demographic, or situational," according to the law.
The new law says if a screening wasn't performed or was performed inadequately, a woman with mental or physical problems resulting from an abortion could file a civil lawsuit. Doctors would not face criminal charges or lose their medical licenses.
The mental health screening measure is one of two controversial abortion laws passed by state lawmakers this spring that Gov. Dave Heineman signed.
The other one would ban abortions starting at 20 weeks based on assertions from some doctors that fetuses feel pain at that stage of development. It's scheduled to go into effect on October 15.
Published: Thu, Jul 15, 2010
headlines Detroit
headlines National
- ABA Legal Ed council suspends accreditation standard focused on diversity
- How law firms can grow, address artificial intelligence and tackle other challenges in 2025
- In ‘power move’ over independent agencies, Trump demands review of proposed regulations
- Could courts run out of options if federal officials defy court orders?
- Judge texted bailiff, clerk that he can’t be in court next day because ‘I just shot my wife,’ jurors are told
- Judge admonished for ‘undignified’ behavior, including gestures mimicking pumping of breast milk